AI isn’t replacing creative people. AI is redefining creative operations.

Generative AI is still a long way from being able to understand a brief and ideate on it in the way that a true creative can, but it is dismantling the workflows used to deliver those outputs for the better.

For years, the AI debate has fixated on whether machines can ultimately replace the value of creative processes that are fundamentally human. Replacing real jobs with robot jockeys. But it’s becoming increasingly apparent that the real value, the real disruption, lies elsewhere. The pursuit of that elusive ‘big idea’ is likely to remain a human endeavour for the foreseeable future. What is changing, however, is the machinery that fleshes out creative concepts into fully executed campaigns.

People ideate. Generative AI creates. And agentic AI orchestrates. This is fast becoming the new normal.

Together they are remaking creative operations for speed, agility, and scale. The challenge for brands and their creatives is now successfully working within an ecosystem where machines do the heavy lifting and plot the way forward.

But is your team ready?

The real evolution is in our processes

Much of the conversation around AI in creative work focuses on generation. Copy, images, video, code… that sort of thing. A popular, but incomplete, viewpoint. Because it hyper fixates on inputs and outputs rather than what happens in-between. Where the disruption is actually taking place.

Generative AI is powerful, but it’s still reactive. You give it a prompt, it generates a response. Then it sits around and twiddles its proverbial thumbs. Waiting for the next input. Now plug that generative capacity into agentic capabilities and you’re truly onto something revolutionary. An ecosystem that can plan, prioritise, and adapt without the delays of human intervention, without the need for someone to push those assets along the production line. And, ultimately, publish them.

Simply put, the linear progression looks something like this:

  • Yesterday: Creative operations moved work from stage to stage, then waited on approvals, resourcing, and file wrangling.
  • Today: Creative operations still manually moves work along, plugging gaps to enable faster production using generative tools.
  • Tomorrow: Agentic systems move campaign elements forward on their own, with only the briefest human interventions to sense-check critical decision-making and provide final approvals.

Variations are produced, missing inputs are requested, risks are flagged, and schedules adjusted in real-time. Large enterprises using AI-powered automation report reductions of 40 to 60 percent in production timelines. Some teams are already ideating and then churning out multi-channel campaigns in hours rather than weeks.

From linear pipelines to fluid networks

Most studios still run a version of the same assembly line. Work starts at one end, passes through a series of predefined stages, and eventually emerges as a finished asset. Brief arrives. Creative team explores. First pass is made. Review happens. Changes are requested. Files are updated. Assets are trafficked. Publishing follows.

In smaller agencies and in-house marketing teams this cadence may well still hold, but anything bigger than a boutique now finds itself bottlenecked by speed, complexity, and multi-channel demands. Campaigns now splinter into dozens of placements per market. Social needs fresh creative weekly, sometimes daily. Localisation is constant. And so on.

Most teams have already squeezed the obvious efficiencies. With templates, playbooks, and some basic automations. Even so, work still queues up in the same choke points. Someone is always waiting for someone else, and every wait adds cost. But while the linear pipeline breaks down, AI changes the geometry. Instead of rigid handoffs, agentic AI enables fluid, parallel workflows. One agent can work on localisation and translation, while another scales visuals and applies campaign design elements, and another validates brand and legal guidelines have been met. For example.

The result is a networked model that compresses timelines through collaboration between models trained to be the ultimate experts in their given functions.

It’s more than just automation as you know it

If you’re thinking, “We already have automation…”, take a moment to appreciate this fundamental leap: where your current workflow tools stop, agents are only starting.

Tools like Monday, Asana, Screendragon, and the rest are excellent at visualising work, centralising updates, and enforcing simple rules-based automations. You can see what is in flight, what is late, and who is responsible. If a task is delayed, send a message. If a file is uploaded, change the status. They are strong organisers, but their automations still largely depend on human-triggered actions.

An agent goes further, moves from automation to autonomy. It sees the context, takes the action, and outputs across systems. It doesn’t just execute pre-set rules. It decides what needs to happen based on context. It can detect issues without being told, reprioritise work, and take action without waiting for a human to notice. It operates across your entire production ecosystem, not just inside one tool.

This is why the shift isn’t just another automation, it’s a redefinition of who or what drives the workflow forward.

But what does Agentic AI really mean in terms of Creative Ops?

Agentic AI sounds technical. In practice it is simple to picture. Imagine a small helper that can see what is happening, decide the next sensible step, and do it, within rules you set. It does not replace your judgement. It carries the load between points of judgement.

There are four basic behaviours in your typical Agentic AI process:

  • See: The agent reads the situation across your systems.

e.g. It checks the DAM for the latest master. It reads the traffic board. It sees the campaign plan, the placement schedule, and the legal checklist. It notices that the French version is missing, that the key visual is still in review, and that the ad server has a slot tonight.

  • Decide: The agent weighs what matters most. It breaks the goal into smaller steps, orders those steps, and sets a pace.

e.g. It decides that the missing French version is the critical path, that the copy needs a formal tone, that legal will want a disclaimer on the print version, and that the video cut needs to stay under fifteen seconds for a particular placement.

  • Do: The agent takes one or more actions and/or generates outputs based on its decisions.

e.g. It outputs a draft variant. It routes a task to the right person for the line that must remain human. It books a review slot. It updates a placement. It writes a status note and posts it to the right channel. It moves the file to the right folder with the right metadata.

  • Learn: The agent records outcomes, maps successes against failures, and updates the pattern it uses next time.

e.g. It learnt that the French version was overlooked so it’ll flag that as a priority to look for on the next cycle. Or on a different cycle may learn a certain template performs better than the last one it picked for that audience and make the adjustment automatically.

Agentic systems are doers, not dashboards.

Article content

Whose job is at risk then?

It’s likely the end of the workflow co-ordinator, resource manager, or studio lead, depending on what your company calls them. The person whose primary job is to keep work moving routing briefs, reallocating resources, chasing approvals, and updating schedules. It’s important work, but it’s also prime territory for automation.

While we’ve already seen how generative AI speeds up content creation, we only beginning to see how Agentic AI is absorbing much of the coordination role. From automatically assigning tasks to the right person or agent to asset versioning and localisation to negotiating deadlines between stakeholders to escalating issues when human input is required.

The focus will shift from the day-to-day management of workflows to designing and optimising workflow systems. What was once a full-time coordination role will evolve into an ‘AI Workflow Architect’ or similar. A person who does not chase people, but instead designs prompt libraries and teaches AI agents, configuring how they work together, setting operational rules, and defining escalation paths

How else will teams need to change?

When parts of the flow become autonomous, people stop spending time on busywork and start spending it on design, storytelling, and system quality. The craft remains at the core while roles within the team emerge and evolve.

Change should occur in four key positions:

  • Creative Ops Lead

Owns the production system. Keeps the flow healthy. Aligns with brand, media, and strategy. Translates business priorities into rules that the system can follow. This person turns the studio into a platform that supports the work rather than a series of ad hoc rescues.

  • AI Workflow Architect

Designs how agents cooperate with people and with each other. Builds prompt libraries and pattern packs so the work starts in the right place. Defines escalation paths and service-level expectations, then tunes them over time.

  • Creative Engineer

Converts brand systems into reusable assets. Builds template families for hero, mid-funnel, and performance formats. Maintains modular content blocks that hold the narrative steady across markets. Writes prompt patterns that keep verbal and visual tone and manner aligned to brand.

  • Model and policy steward

Maintains the guardrails. Looks after copyright hygiene, licensing, bias checks, and brand consistency. Keeps the policy rules that agents obey, and keeps the audit trail accurate. This person is often the bridge to legal and risk.

It’s important to note that you should not need four new hires. In many teams these are hats people already wear. The difference is that the work is now formalised around agentic AI and focused on achieving increasing levels of autonomy in production.

How to achieve your first agentic workflows

Even a light setup can deliver results that prove the value and open up budgets to plot the way forward. Because your ambition should be to turn interest into belief. Both for management and production. And the good news is that you do not need a complete rebuild to get going.

Typically, you can establish a workable pilot inside of 90 days if you commit to the following timeline:

  • Weeks 1 to 2: Map and baseline

Pick a flow that repeats often and causes pain. Social cut-downs, language variants, or performance banners are common candidates. Map the steps and mark where work stalls. Baseline cycle time, first-time-right rate, and rework hours. Determine a short set of guardrails. Choose a narrow scope so wins arrive quickly.

  • Weeks 3 to 6: Run one contained agent

Select a task that is safe and frequent. Resizing is practical. Metadata tagging is another. Language variants work when you have approved glossaries and style rules. Turn on logging. Compare outcomes to your baseline. Fix one friction point each week so people feel the improvement.

  • Weeks 7 to 10: Connect a second task and add human review

Link two small steps so the studio experiences a hand-off. Let the first agent produce sizes. Let the second attach metadata and route files to the right folders and markets. Add a human-in-the-loop at one meaningful moment so the team sees governance in action. Tune prompts. Tighten rules. Document the playbook so the pattern can spread.

  • Weeks 11 to 12: Share results and plan the next scope

Determine speed, quality, and cost outcomes. Define and present successes. Show where guardrails are working. Define key tweaks and optimisations for the next iteration.

By the end of the pilot you should be able to deliver a plan for the next evolution, with a wider scope, more autonomy, and a cautious budget expansion. Build confidence, build skills, and create evidence for leadership. Prove to the studio that the system exists to help them do better work, not to replace them or bury them in more process.

And it’s critical to start as soon as possible.

Article content

Why the urgency?

This is one of those adapt-or-die moments. Agentic adoption is moving quickly across the industry. Creative Ops teams that keep the old, hand-off heavy cadence will start to look slow and costly next to studios running parallel, agent-supported flows.

At this rate of adoption the timeline is looking very short for companies already falling behind:

  • 0-6 months: Automation

GenAI continues to speed up production with the plenty of human coordination still required.

  • 6–12 months: Augmentation

Increasing levels of human-AI co-creation with humans ideating more and coordinating less while AI handles repetitive execution

  • 12–24 months: Autonomous Orchestration

Agentic AI takes over workflow management, decision-making, and labour-intensive production. Human oversight becomes governance.

AI is not replacing creative people. The brief, the ideation, and the judgement will be by humans for humans.

But AI is redefining creative operations. Generative systems supply speed. Agentic systems supply flow. Together they make studios calmer and more capable.

In retrospect, the bottleneck has never been the idea. Has it? It has always been the production. The work between the idea and the delivery. And it’s time to hand it over.

Article content

ManMachine: Creative Ops for the Agentic Era

At ManMachine, we help brands, agencies and in-house teams rewire their creative operations to leverage the advantages of AI. While the big idea remains human — it’s the workflow that must evolve to empower agentic systems to carry the load between brief and delivery.

Here’s how we make that happen:

  • From linear pipelines to fluid networks: We’ll help you shift from rigid workflows to flexible agentic AI systems moving in parallel.
  • From governance to guardrails: We’ll help you design scalable, AI powered production eco systems around your requirements, from end-to-end.
  • From pilot to end product: We’ll help you build everything from your pilot project to your finished product, from start to finish.

Creative operations is no longer a cost centre, it’s a lever that determines whether can deliver more personalised, more effective media at scale. With less.

If you’re ready to move from reactive production to agent-ready operations, let’s talk.

Subscribe
featured posts

Infinitely cloned content and the quest for authenticity... Is human imperfection about to become a rare commodity?

Creative has become a commodity. Is the ad-holdco model on the brink in a world of production at scale?

AI isn’t replacing creative people. AI is redefining creative operations.

The Second Browser War: Rise of the AI Browser